
There has been much talk recently as to the many controversial training methods, that so many horses endure.
For example, rolkur (used in dressage) has received headline news, claiming it as abusive training. Many in the respected dressage community are outraged.
How could a sport, which focuses on horse-human harmony be brought down to such lows? What benefits are gained by such methods?
The aim of every dressage rider is to train a horse to ture submission- soft in the jaw, attentive to the lightest of aids.
Rolkur is often used as an attempt to achieve undeniable 'submission'. The idea is, that when the horse is overbent, he will build up better muscling, and adopt the proper head carriage easier during dressage tests.
Now, most will agree a little bit of rolkur training, for a couple minutes every so often is not abusive, but when a horse must maintain this position for extended periods of time, both mental and physical stress ensues.
How does a stressed horse remain soft in the jaw? He doesn't.
So why do a select few of the top dressage trainers use this training 'method'? It is hard to say- maybe to achieve submission, as they are not capable to achieve it any other way- but quite probably, it is because of who's winning.
Anky van Grunsven, perhaps, was one of the spurhead riders of the 'rolkur movement'. Seeing as how successful she has been in competition, many dressage wanna-be's, seem to be adopting the same training- sending the dressage community into the midst of controversy, and wondering if rule changes should be in store.
So, what do you think? Is rolkur abusive? Are there times when it is acceptable? Share your thoughts!
For example, rolkur (used in dressage) has received headline news, claiming it as abusive training. Many in the respected dressage community are outraged.
How could a sport, which focuses on horse-human harmony be brought down to such lows? What benefits are gained by such methods?
The aim of every dressage rider is to train a horse to ture submission- soft in the jaw, attentive to the lightest of aids.
Rolkur is often used as an attempt to achieve undeniable 'submission'. The idea is, that when the horse is overbent, he will build up better muscling, and adopt the proper head carriage easier during dressage tests.
Now, most will agree a little bit of rolkur training, for a couple minutes every so often is not abusive, but when a horse must maintain this position for extended periods of time, both mental and physical stress ensues.
How does a stressed horse remain soft in the jaw? He doesn't.
So why do a select few of the top dressage trainers use this training 'method'? It is hard to say- maybe to achieve submission, as they are not capable to achieve it any other way- but quite probably, it is because of who's winning.
Anky van Grunsven, perhaps, was one of the spurhead riders of the 'rolkur movement'. Seeing as how successful she has been in competition, many dressage wanna-be's, seem to be adopting the same training- sending the dressage community into the midst of controversy, and wondering if rule changes should be in store.
So, what do you think? Is rolkur abusive? Are there times when it is acceptable? Share your thoughts!


